It can be difficult to pull apart the concepts of knowledge co-creation, open assignments, and peer collaboration. Below is a comparison of knowledge co-creation assignments, some within open pedagogy and some outside of open pedagogy.
Within Open Pedagogy
Outside of Open Pedagogy
Open assignments result in renewable, public-facing work that engage students in the production of lasting content, such as blog posts, video tutorials, or open textbooks. Student-driven content facilitates personalized learning, allowing learners to choose methods that align with their interests, needs and learning styles. They also promote collaboration and peer review, as students build on each other's work. By incorporating iterative projects, future cohorts can refine and enhance the work, ensuring its longevity and impact.
Creating public knowledge: Students create public-facing content that contributes to open knowledge platforms. Examples:
Student-driven content: Students choose their project format, creating open resources based on personal interests or course relevance. Examples:
Iterative and evolving projects: Projects designed to be expanded upon by future students. Examples:
Collaboration and peer review: Group projects or peer review where students co-create open content or evaluate each other's contributions. Examples:
This is just a small sample to illustrate that there are many more examples freely available online.
Peer collaboration in open pedagogy empowers students to learn from each other, improve their work through feedback from different perspectives, and create renewable educational resources. Hands-on and participatory learning deepens their engagement, encourages reflective practice, and fosters community.
Group Creation of OER: Students collaborate to develop open educational resources (e.g., open textbooks, multimedia like YouTube videos) that future learners can use. An example would be "In your assigned groups, write a chapter for an open textbook on a key event from the Civil Rights Movement. Each group will focus on a different event, and the final chapters will be published online for use by future history students."
Peer Review and Critique: Students review and provide feedback on each other's work, fostering critical thinking, learning from diverse perspectives, and civil engagement. An example would be "Exchange your research paper on economic theories of income inequality with a classmate and provide feedback based on the provided rubric. Focus on clarity of argument and use of economic models."
Open Annotations: Collaborative tools like Hypothes.is allow students to annotate readings together, sharing insights and reflections in real time. An example would be "Using Hypothes.is, annotate the assigned reading from Durkheim’s The Division of Labor in Society, adding your insights and questions. Respond to at least two peers’ comments to deepen the discussion."
Open-Ended, Group-Based Projects: Teams of students work on open projects that contribute to the community or are published openly. An example would be "Work in your assigned teams to design an open-source, energy-efficient device to solve a sustainability problem in your community. Your project and documentation will be published online, where others can build on your work."