There are some usual suspects when it comes to accessibility problems. With OER mainly being online, special attention should be paid to navigation. Interactive exercises, frequently included in in OER, are also likely to be problematic. In managing reading list programs, electronic materials digitized from physical library materials often fall short depending on the quality of OCR and lack of alt text for images, tables, figures, and diagrams. Additionally, faculty often have the freedom to edit their reading list; as a program manager, that freedom introduces a wild card which is hard to stay on top of.
Accessibility can be mysterious, even intimidating, for those not feeling confident in technical aspects of web development. Breaking the problem down into constituent parts, and looking at each individually, is a good way to gain understanding and confidence in this realm. There are tools available online that ostensibly run accessibility checks and provide reports, but you become a better practitioner if you first learn the basics before simply plugging a URL or uploading a document into a checker. With basic knowledge you will know what you are looking at in the report, be able to track that back to the website or document structure, and have ideas for how to solve or avoid the problem.
OER Accessibility Toolkit - introduction for non-technical people focusing on eight best practices
WCAG Guidelines: Where to Start? - non-technical starting points for understanding web accessibility
How to Meet WCAG 2 Quick Reference - "customizable quick reference to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2 requirements (success criteria) and techniques"
There is a small world of standards and laws currently covering web accessibility. Though not a long list, each standard and law is complex. Below are some resources for both technical and lay audiences.