READING LIST MANAGEMENT systems enable integration of library content and services into students' everyday learning environments. This is achieved via an LTI integration in learning management systems (LMS). These reading lists are built on top of library systems and managed mainly by library staff, creating a significant contribution for libraries in their schools' course delivery efforts. Providing free or low-cost course materials via reading list improves equity and access to course content, and can support the adoption of open educational resources (OER) by facilitating easy discovery and inclusion of library holdings and services. These systems are licensed for a yearly subscription fee which can be offset by double-to-triple digit student savings ROIs (e.g., $50 in students savings for every dollar spent on the subscription fee). Beyond student savings, organizational benefits for libraries who run successful programs include closer collaboration with a number of colleagues (e.g., instructional designers, general counsel, the registrar, bookstores, academic departments) and processes (e.g. course marking, student information system loads, LMS configuration). From the perspective of these other departments, the library is lightening their load, bringing expertise, and a bridge to copyright support. More in-depth information about what is involved in managing these systems can be found over on our Program Management page.
Many library vendors have developed LIBRARY LTI INTEGRATIONS of their own which, with buy-in and permission from your LMS administrator, can be installed in your school's LMS. They are normally a few ways to use them, but often they can be inserted straight from a button in the WYSIWYG editor of your LMS. Two of the most common LTI integrations from library vendors are content LTIs (add content from a database or publisher) and information literacy module LTIs. Below is a small list of examples which is not exhaustive.
Examples of Information Literacy LTIs
LINKING TO CONTENT from libraries in syllabi and learning management systems can be a better fit than a reading list. Instructors will either assemble links in DIY manner or send a syllabus to the library requesting links. Following the eReserves paradigm, libraries may upload fair use portions of digitized physical content to a server and provide links. It is very difficult if not impossible for libraries to know how often their users are linking to content inside or outside the LMS. Your LMS admin may be willing to do a sitewide search for your EZProxy prefix in the LMS, but the output is usually poorly formatted and duplicative when courses have been offered more than one semester. Below are some content management problems and suggestions for linked library content
Things that can go wrong:
Once the content is in a syllabus or LMS course, what ways are there to "content manage" these library links? Here are some strategies: